Learning English at school is often seen as more inportant than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out.
Given to the effects that globalisation have on our lives, it is assumed that knowledge of foreign languages is crucial today. Some people believe that teaching English in schools is more important than lessons of local languages which are at risk of extinction, if they are not taught. In my opinion, although learning English is essential in today's world, local languages are more important to be taught in schools and with actions we should try to ensure that they survive.
The first reason why learning local languages is more important than learning English is that languages have a huge impact on individual's personality. There is no doubt that a language is one element of cultural identity of that nation. So teaching local languages in schools can ensure that children become aware of their country's history and culture differences from early stages of their lives. Therefore, a language links them with the past which probably will influence the person who they will be in the future. Furthermore, some research results suggest that different languages affect the way how people think and behave differently. Thus, local languages lessons are more important than learning foreign languages.
If some local languages spoken by minority, for example, are not taught, they might extinct. To preserve our precious languages, several measures can be taken. The first one, probably most important, of those is to incorporate local languages into school curriculum. In other words, making mandatory lessons will prevent them from danger of dying out. Also, the government should popularise these languages in danger and organise advertising campaigns, for instance, for children and youth. But without support of families it is impossible to make children be interested in local languages. Parents should probably encourage learn those languages and show their interest in it too.
Overall, it seems that learning foreign language is crucial in today's world, but learning local languages in schools is more important than that as they might disappear. Moreover, to preserve local languages the government should take proactive actions as well as families.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | arul judah | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | aria etemadi | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-21 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | Theasto | 56 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 84
- the table below shows information and prediction regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country. 61
- Learning English at school is often seen as more inportant than learning local languages. If these are not taught, many are at risk of dying out. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...is that languages have a huge impact on individuals personality. There is no doubt that a l...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, no doubt, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41592920354 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6830461277 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507374631268 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 555.3 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2348912336 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26251812261 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917562154673 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.093417010375 0.0667982634062 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184175907854 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0454106567894 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.