Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Although science and technology will continue to improve, the most significant improvement for the quality of people`s lives have already taken place.
Nobody can overlook the fact that in this progressive and sophisticated world, where we live, people are seeking for better life quality. While some people hold the opinion that most of the improvements in folk`s lives have already happened, others stand at the other end of this continuum and believe that there is a lot of advancement that people can reach in the future by applying science and technology. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the latter group and my justifications that substantiate my point of view are elaborated hereupon.
To begin with, every day, science and technology enhancements can open a tremendous amount of doors for life advancement. In other words, by the advent of new technology every day, something new can be invented, something that people had not been able to envision it before. And our world has a significant amount of capacity for emergence something new. For example, up to now, nobody could devise a method for transferring smells through the internet between places being so far from each other. As a result, the aforementioned idea can be a deficiency in the modern world, which future generations should do research on it and make outstanding efforts to find a solution.
Furthermore, we are not aware of future generation desires and potential; therefore, it is more likely that they will feel a considerable amount of deficiency in various aspect of their life`s quality. To be more specific, Should technology, and science grow as fast as in recent years, the future world will be highly different from now. Also, by changing life due to science improvements, people will face challenges that will demand high-tech innovations. For instance, it is probable that future humans can find ways and instruments for traveling and living in other planets, in order to resolve the challenges of life on earth, such as lack of enough food and water.
In a nutshell, according to the aforementioned reasons, I am of the mind that people`s lives have not reached all of its improvements because by science enhancement folks will discover new subjects, and also we are not sure about our future demand and potentials.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | jeffhjz | 76 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | Royaaa | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | faranaksln | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | faranaksln | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | faranaksln | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is 78
- tpo 42 78
- Which of the following do you think would be the most effective way that a teacher can use to make the students more interested in classes?1.Use more technological ways2.Group discussion3.Real-world examples 73
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects of the way young people behave. Agree or disagree? 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 43.0788530466 67% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 361.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07756232687 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98698203518 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554016620499 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.1344086022 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3353231912 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.0 100.406767564 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.7692307692 20.6045352989 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.92307692308 5.45110844103 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237561759135 0.236089414692 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814653407819 0.076458572812 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448530352013 0.0737576698707 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145794720902 0.150856017488 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0310142766444 0.0645574589148 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 11.7677419355 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 58.1214874552 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 10.002688172 145% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.0537634409 127% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.