The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK School in 1981, 1991 and 2001.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The diagrams compare the total of yearly expenditure of an educational institution in The United Kingdom in three decades (from 1981 to 2001). Overall, teacher’s wages responsible for the biggest spending, while insurance contributed the smallest proportion among the spending. Besides, the amount of money spent on insurance saw a significant increase during the period.
In 1981, teacher’s salaries and workers’ wages contributed as the largest share of school expenditure, while the former accounted for more than a third, the latter observed 28%. furniture and equipment, and material resources comprised a similar number of 15% each, while insurance shared a small percentage of the spending (2%).
1991 observed a significant increase in insurance expenditure (precisely 1%) followed by material resources from 15% to 20% and teacher salaries from 40% to 50%. In contrast, both furniture and equipment and other workers’ salaries saw a significant decrease by precisely 66% and 22% respectively.
There was a most rise in the amount of money spent on furniture in 2001 (from 5% in 1991 to 23%) and equipment of about twofold. In contrast, the total spending on material resources decreased by 11%. Also, two remaining components, other workers’ and teachers’ salaries decreased at about 7% and 5% respectively.
- Research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes when set free. What are the reasons? What can be done to solve the problem? 78
- Some people get into debt by buying things they don’t need and can’t afford. What are the reasons for this behaviour? What action can be taken to prevent people from having this problem? 73
- The chart below shows how primary secondary and tertiary students in Britain spend their free time 67
- The pictures below show the recycling process of wasted glass bottles. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 78
- People Participate in IELTS Program in 6 English Courses in Pare, 2016 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furniture
... than a third, the latter observed 28%. furniture and equipment, and material resources c...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1150.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63725490196 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28283548823 2.65546596893 124% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.9748284902 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0632916057376 0.215688989381 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0281544284419 0.103423049105 27% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282762040299 0.0843802449381 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0415168831382 0.15604864568 27% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014512702245 0.0819641961636 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.4140731707 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.