Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Education is a very important factor that can shape people's personality from early ages, and also has a profound effect on their success in future. Although teachers play a key role in the education systems, according to the statistics many believe that their value in the society has been deminishing in the recent century. I agree with this notion, because of two considerable reasons that are elaborated herunder.
In the past, most of the population of the countries lived in rural areas, and because of the dearth of appropriate facilities, they were mostly illiterate. Teachers were those who were highly educated comparing to the others, and knew a lot about a variety of subjects, a feature which made them to be respected so much. There were many cases that the adults came and confered with the teachers, while facing quandaries in their lives. As literacy and education became more and more prevalent, the teachers superioriy began to fade away.
Alongside the reason discussed above, there has been another determining factor afflicting teachers prestige. With the developement of the countries, the society became more complicated, providing a great opportunity for new lucrative occupations. Seeing the numerous enterpreneurs who had made a fortune by producing a simple product, people began to realize that education is not the only way to success. While teachers job were not in a direct relation with production and trade, they had a miserly constant income. This circumstances has escalated in the recent century, and so people does not value and appretiate the teachers like before. In my country for example, doctors make a lot of money, and they are so respected for that.
In sum, although teachers are great people who can teach of important lessons, the dismal reality is that they are not as important as before. Not only are there more educated people comparing to the past, but also there are more profitable and respectful jobs available, which make the teaching mundane and ordinary. People should appreciate the teachers more, because those are who detemine how their children would think and behave in future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 60 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | nusybah | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | Opak Pulup | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-04 | naziii | 73 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Workers are more satisfied when they have many different types of tasks to do during the workday than when they do similar tasks all day long. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Teachers were more appreciated and valued by society in the past than they are nowadays. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 138, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... has a profound effect on their success in future. Although teachers play a key role in t...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 539, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
...rly constant income. This circumstances has escalated in the recent century, and so...
^^^
Line 7, column 436, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...w their children would think and behave in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 43.0788530466 51% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 52.1666666667 82% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1802.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 349.0 407.700716846 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16332378223 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7342661167 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527220630372 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 586.8 618.680645161 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6003584229 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.396894783 48.9658058833 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 112.625 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8125 20.6045352989 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0625 5.45110844103 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202761021266 0.236089414692 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675513754514 0.076458572812 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0336973870048 0.0737576698707 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12421812313 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020071030532 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 11.7677419355 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.01818996416 114% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.