TPO 46
The material discusses the concept of recording patients' information in electronic databases. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely using the medical record database is cost-effective. Next, electronic medical records could eliminate errors and mistakes. Finally, adopting medical record systems could help researchers to access and gather patients' information.
Conversely, the listening challenges the points, one specific contradiction is doctors who adopt electronic medical record still need to keep some paper for any sort of emergency; furthermore, they could store paper for any legal purposes. As a result, they may stay have to pay for storing costs. In addition to that, using medical electronic record doctors will still use pen and paper to take notes or write prescriptions, then other medical stuff could enter this information into computers. Therefore, mistakes could happen due to poor handwriting. One final point, if patients' information recorded in electronic databases researchers will still have difficulty to access information due to the strict privacy law in THe United States; moreover, researchers should follow many procedures and permissions even from patients. For example, some patients block the use od their medical records for any purposes other than medical treatments. Medical databases' accessibility is not easy.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-30 | sonyeoso | 80 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | afgmar | 70 | view |
| 2021-08-12 | yasamiamirreza | 70 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | mahi22 | 80 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | 70 | view |
- the lines sinosauropteryx represent feathers 67
- do you agree or disagree? young people are more influenced by celebrities' life than older people? 73
- tpo 54 3
- tpo 42 76
- some people believe that the Internet provides them with a lot of information, while others believe that access to much information creates problems? which do you prefer? 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ints outlined in the reading passage. Firstly, the reading details specific po...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess and gather patients information. Conversely, the listening challenges the...
^^^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...per for any legal purposes. As a result, they may stay have to pay for storing co...
^^
Line 5, column 957, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'databases'' or 'database's'?
Suggestion: databases'; database's
... other than medical treatments. Medical databases accessibility is not easy.
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 994, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al databases accessibility is not easy.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, look, may, moreover, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, sort of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 10.4613686534 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 12.0772626932 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 22.412803532 27% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 30.3222958057 63% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1373.03311258 95% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.86486486486 5.08290768461 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93024163607 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 145.348785872 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603603603604 0.540411800872 112% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 4.0 8.23620309051 49% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 71.1529553536 49.2860985944 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 110.228320801 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 21.698381199 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.9166666667 7.06452816374 197% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.551743552764 0.272083759551 203% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21287762649 0.0996497079465 214% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.112784076157 0.0662205650399 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.36640407009 0.162205337803 226% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127209192749 0.0443174109184 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.3589403974 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.71 12.2367328918 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.42419426049 111% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.