An increasing number of people today change their career and place of residence several times during their life. Is this a positive or negative development?
People nowadays prefer changing vocations and accommodations during their life because of advanced transportation. While some people argue it exerts an adverse impact, I firmly agree that it’s mostly a positive development.
Migrating frequently poses a threat on community cohesion. People were familiar with their neighbors generations ago since they lived in the same neighborhood for long period, and sometimes even for half of their life. Under the same local culture context, they were likely to get along well with each other, leading to better understanding and less conflicts in the neighborhood. However, it is difficult for current residents to adopt local norms and traditions after migrating and moving to unfamiliar areas. Less time are available to learn more about neighbors for those frequently moving away. This can be the main factors behind people’s low-level integration in new communities.
However, advantages are generated to individuals and companies. Due to this tendency, more options to suitable vocations and pleasant living places are offered for those intending to uplift their life quality, which can not only promotes career advancement but also broaden people’s horizons by exposing them to various customs. In addition, this phenomenon make distance no longer an factor to be considered for job-searching. A thus freer flow of labor force benefits companies and increases the likelihood for them to recruit competent staff. In that regard, changing careers and resident places seems to be a conducive trend compared to the situation where citizens stay in one place.
In conclusion, although such movement may produce some negative impacts, it is beneficial for personal progress and firms’ development to some extent.
- The government should spend money in promoting sport and art in school rather than sponsoring professional sports and art events in communities To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 80
- An increasing number of people today change their career and place of residence several times during their life. Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people believe governments should spend money in saving languages of few speakers from dying out completely. Others think this is a waste of financial resources. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 346, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun conflicts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...er, leading to better understanding and less conflicts in the neighborhood. However,...
^^^^
Line 9, column 388, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...this phenomenon make distance no longer an factor to be considered for job-searchi...
^^
Line 9, column 567, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...recruit competent staff. In that regard, changing careers and resident places see...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, thus, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1521.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67537313433 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98994704959 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686567164179 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0066022137 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.642857143 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1428571429 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.21428571429 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279682325722 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0763758168358 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701989791526 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153023577066 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740534431989 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.