parent should get their children money for every high grade
There is no doubt that the way of training children by their parents is a crucial factor in their future life. The ever-increasing prominence of education of children in a standard approach has engendered this question as to whether it is better for parents to give their children money for every good grade or not. Some people believe that giving money to children for an excellent score could make them greedy, while I am of the opinion that it is more rational to give children money for their excellent grades. There are several grounds, two of which I will explore in what follows.
The first reason coming to mind is that giving an award can be an excellent motivation for school-age children. In the way of illustration, when children know that if they do their job very well, they could get money, they would try very hard and study more delicately to get a good score. This motivation would help them to be a hard-working student, and as a result, they would prosper in school and unearth their latent talent with more chance. My own experience is a compelling example of this. When I was in primary school, I was not a good student, and I always did my homework half-heartedly. Accordingly, my parents told me if I Took a high score in each course, they would give me ten dollars. After that day, I began to study more accurately and did my homework in the best way. Because I knew that in this way I could get ten dollars from my parents which was very exciting for me at that age. Had my parents not designated money for each high score, I would not have tried that much.
The second noteworthy reason which deserves some words here is that when children earn money with their efforts, they better know the value of money. In other words, if parents regularly give their children a designated amount of money for their requirement, these children never appreciate the worth of money. In contrast, children who get money as a result of their endeavor would be more accounting individuals in the future. For instance, I always got money from my parents only when my grades were high, while my brother always was gotting a determined amount of money from our parents. As a result, now I always work very diligently because I know that this is the only way to earn money. Conversely, my brother is still dependent on my parents. This example demonstrates giving children money for their high grades, could lead to their succession in the future.
On the whole, based on the points mentioned above, if parents give their children money for every high grade not only children would have more motivation for trying, but also they would earn money more readily in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-30 | the_feynman_lady | 60 | view |
| 2021-04-27 | talelaldabous | 66 | view |
| 2021-03-03 | talelaldabous | 70 | view |
| 2020-06-25 | azxa7887 | 71 | view |
| 2019-09-23 | Negarh185 | 73 | view |
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for every good grade 65
- parent should get their children money for every high grade 73
- TPO43-Integrated writing 76
- Do you agree or disagree?Nowadays it is not important for people to haveregular family meals together. 70
- news which propagate by media are accurate 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 220, Rule ID: WHETHER[6]
Message: Can you shorten this phrase to just 'whether', or rephrase the sentence to avoid "as to"?
Suggestion: whether
...d approach has engendered this question as to whether it is better for parents to give their ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, conversely, first, if, second, so, still, well, while, as to, for instance, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, in other words, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 70.0 43.0788530466 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2214.0 1977.66487455 112% => OK
No of words: 475.0 407.700716846 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66105263158 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66845742379 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53397610546 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.431578947368 0.524837075471 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 679.5 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 9.59856630824 156% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1569002653 48.9658058833 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.428571429 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.619047619 20.6045352989 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.80952380952 5.45110844103 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461146661654 0.236089414692 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151325442937 0.076458572812 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12929103916 0.0737576698707 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.352889177158 0.150856017488 234% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908333978416 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 58.1214874552 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.22 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 86.8835125448 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.