TPO41
There is no doubt that always teachers have had a substantiate role in every society. A controversial question which arises here is whether or not teachers were more appreciated in the past than nowadays. Some people may hold the idea that
The first noteworthy point which bears in mind is that nowadays students have a free acess to the internet. Therefore, they search whatever they want in the internet instead of asking from their teachers. As a conseqence, most of students think that they can solve their problems easily without help of their teachers. Hence, they do not admire their teachers as much as students in the past. It is no secret that in the past students did not have acess to the internet. Accordingly, they could not solve their problems without help of their teachers. Undoubtely, when students were very dependent to the knowledge of their teachers, they appreciate them more. My own experince is a compelling example of this. Back in college, I had a class with a well-known professor who won several award in his field of study. while he was a very famous professor, students who studied intensively before the class through different websites, always understimate the points that professors mentioned in the class. These students thought that because of the shallow knowledge getting form the internet they can underrate a well-rounded professor. I think that this example how easy students could be offensive about their teachers nowadays.
the second crucial points which deserves some words here is that in the contemporary world, the number of teachers has increased incredibely. As a result, the governments have to allocate less money and facilities to each of them. In contrast, in the past the numbers of teachers were limited because fewer individals were educated in the past. Since the few teachers, schools pay a lot more money and provided nmerous facilities for their teachers. No one can deny the fact that the more schools appreciate teachers, the more money they give to that teachers. Thus, because of the decrease of salary which teachers get, they think that society admire them less than before. For instance, my mother has been a teacher for 20 years. In the past she take a high salary but now because of the number of new teachers their salary
On the whole, based on the points mentioned above, we can conclde that in the past societies more appreciate teachers because in the past not only students were more dependent to their teachers but also their number was less than now.
- news which propagate by media are accurate 73
- It is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents job or not 73
- TPO41 86
- Do you agree or disagree?Nowadays it is not important for people to haveregular family meals together. 70
- parent should get their children money for every high grade 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... no doubt that always teachers have had a substantiate role in every society. A controversial ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 133, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
...roversial question which arises here is whether or not teachers were more appreciated in the p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...days. Some people may hold the idea that The first noteworthy point which bears i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 223, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the students') or simply say ''most students''.
Suggestion: most of the students; most students
...g from their teachers. As a conseqence, most of students think that they can solve their problem...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 779, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun award seems to be countable; consider using: 'several awards'.
Suggestion: several awards
...ass with a well-known professor who won several award in his field of study. while he was a v...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 816, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...on several award in his field of study. while he was a very famous professor, student...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1072, Rule ID: FROM_FORM[4]
Message: Did you mean 'from'?
Suggestion: from
...ecause of the shallow knowledge getting form the internet they can underrate a well-...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...ensive about their teachers nowadays. the second crucial points which deserves so...
^^^
Line 11, column 749, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'she' must be used with a third-person verb: 'takes'.
Suggestion: takes
...a teacher for 20 years. In the past she take a high salary but now because of the nu...
^^^^
Line 11, column 826, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the number of new teachers their salary On the whole, based on the points mentio...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, i think, in contrast, no doubt, as a result, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 49.0 43.0788530466 114% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 52.1666666667 111% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 426.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97887323944 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61239764154 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 212.727598566 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476525821596 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 636.3 618.680645161 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.51792114695 171% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1050519963 48.9658058833 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.4090909091 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 5.45110844103 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.5376344086 181% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 86.8835125448 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.