The issue regarding whether teachers are appreciated and merited more nowadays than in the past has never failed to arouse public concern. Some people believe claim that teachers are more valued nowadays because they can teach students with more high-end technology, such as programming, using computer tools, and assembling robots. Perhaps as sound and attractive as their argument seems, it failed to be verified on further analysis. According, I advocate that teachers were more appreciated before than they are nowadays.
Firstly, the Internet makes teachers less useful nowadays. Due to the development of the network, increasingly, people are happy to share their own experiences and knowledge via the Internet. With the Internet, students can be educated through video websites, like Youtube, also they can acquire that knowledge more efficiently through the Internet. Therefore, teachers might be less useful to the students and be valued less nowadays. This point can be illustrated by a survey conducted by Tsing Hua University, which is the most famous university in China. According to the survey, about sixty percent of students have ever did not go to a lecture, because they can acquire this knowledge through the Internet more efficiently. Also, they can pass, and even get a high score on the final exam. Obviously, this survey may inform us that the teachers are less useful to the student.
Secondly, teachers become less focused on teaching now. To be more specific, in China, teaching is a well-paid job in the past, and almost all teachers concentrate on teaching. Teachers bring knowledge to the students, thus teachers were highly appreciated by society. And yet, nowadays, with the market enlarged, and the goods becoming more expensive, teachers' salary does not follow society, so they have trouble feeding themselves. They stop teaching during the class but after the class for the money. They ask the student's parents for money or teach nothing to the student. This point can be better and further supposed by the example from my little brother. He is in primary school now, his math teacher let student to study by themselves, since the teacher need to teach others for the money. Many parents, including his parents, worried that they can not follow the teaching process, pay more money to teachers for take a traditional class. Apperently, we can learn from this example that teachers are more focused on money today, not on teaching.
In conclusion, considering all the reasons and examples discussed above, we can safely say that teachers were less appreciated and valued by society nowadays than before, which could be definitely attributed to the two points -- the Internet and the teacher's action.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 251, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... the two points -- the Internet and the teachers action.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 15.1003584229 132% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2304.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 440.0 407.700716846 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23636363636 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57997565096 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63872125117 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 212.727598566 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518181818182 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.282872403 48.9658058833 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.173913043 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1304347826 20.6045352989 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95652173913 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282799423084 0.236089414692 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913563821494 0.076458572812 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.094180821003 0.0737576698707 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216048294154 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0999233696408 0.0645574589148 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 11.7677419355 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.01818996416 106% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 86.8835125448 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.