In some countries, the number of people who visit art galleries is declining. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve this problem?
At the onset of the technological era, humankind has constituted solid achievements in conserving historical and cultural arts of our predecessors in galleries yet there seems to be declination in visits of them, meaning that a worrying percentage of people inclined to underestimate the power of art pieces rather than valueing and monitoring them. In this essay, I will shed light on what might have led to such an awkward situation and potential methods to deal with this issue.
It is no secret that expansion of access to the historical art images through internet is one of the root reasons of foregoing situation. In order to populate their websites with consumers, web-developers generate websites with free of charge or low-cost photos of the paintings that we can observe in famous galleries. Consequently, individuals are deluded into thinking there is no need to visit them while all data is accessible through internet by default.
Means of bringing end to appreciation in art galleries ,is alternative A means to an end emptiness in art-galleries, lies through adding banners on websites quoting the address of current location of the original painting with admission fee better by utterly attracting method possible. That is to say, since location and price will be available most of the users will be extremely curious to see the art in reality. Finally, making education free and accessible for majority might generate willingness to visit them. To illustrate, it is well-known fact that having deep understanding and knowledge in world history taught in schools and universities, generates natural curiosity towards visiting historical art-museums.
In conclusion, availability of art photos through internet and lack of free and accessible education are the two main factors of galleries emptiness, which can be resolved by adding original art location and visiting costs at the art-posting websites and investing more on making education free of charge and feasible for majority. If we continue to turn blind-eye on these solutions, galleries may become obsolete for us.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-30 | Faraj.khalikov | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | khanpeter | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | Bhawna Sharma | 78 | view |
- Many people today use their phones for sending texts more than talking. What are the reasons for this? Are there more advantages than disadvantages? 89
- In some countries, the number of people who visit art galleries is declining. What are the reasons for this? How can we solve this problem? 84
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems does this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 89
- Some people believe that people who do physical work should be paid on par with the people who have high level degree Do you agree or disagree 90
- Some people believe that international sporting events are the ideal opportunity to show the world the qualities of the hosting nation. Others believe that these events are mainly a large unjustifiable expense. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 55, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing end to appreciation in art galleries ,is alternative A means to an end emptine...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, if, may, so, well, while, in conclusion, in fact, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39090909091 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07317550971 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587878787879 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 88.0204709473 49.4020404114 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.727272727 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 20.7667163134 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.90909090909 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206346985726 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726855703064 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361446812309 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124726958169 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408296202017 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.0 13.0946893788 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 10.7795591182 186% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.