The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts?
It is true that traditional family mealtime is becoming a thing of the past. There are a number of reasons behind this trend, which could lead to several negative consequences on both individuals and societies.
There are various reasons why families tend to spend less time eating together these days. Firstly, many young people nowadays no longer live with their family for study or working reasons. They migrate from countryside to cities where they are more likely to find well-paid jobs or choose to study at a foreign institution which can offer better courses in order to gain more valuable qualifications. Secondly, many parents usually have to work overtime until midnight due to the increasing hectic life and the growing costs of living, whereas their children are forced to study not only at schools but also in private centers in order to supplement skills and knowledge. As the result, they rarely have time eating together and there are many situations where their schedules even conflict.
A variety of related problems could be caused by this tendency. The main issue is that the absence of family meals could be connected to loose relationships between family members because people usually share emotions and discuss their own stories and difficulties that they have to face during meal time. In addition, this may even cause generation gap when grandparents and parents misunderstand their children. Another problem is the loss of underlying meaning of cultural and traditional events of a nation. For example, in traditional holidays such as Tet holiday, many people tend to prioritize their private space and choose to travel alone or with their friends rather than have meals with their family.
In conclusion, there are different reasons for the gradual disappearance of traditional mealtime involved all family members, and this could have many negative effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-01 | Thang Tran | 89 | view |
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help, so we shouldonly be concerned with our own communities and countries.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governmentsrather than private companies. Do you agree or disagree? 84
- The tradition that the family gets together to eat meals is disappearing. What are the reasons? What are the impacts? 84
- Pie chart 11
- Families who send their children to private schools should not berequired to pay taxes that support the state education system.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[3]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
...e of family meals could be connected to loose relationships between family members be...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, whereas, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1594.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26072607261 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65644792393 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.600660066007 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.400191113 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.615384615 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3076923077 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1515822385 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604257744269 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568176621526 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0988852977629 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00752715426094 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.