The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
The given two illustrations show the differences between before and after the development of an island for tourism spots. As we can see, the island has more accommodations and tourist facilities after the construction compared to the previous map.
First of all, the first map showed an enormous huge empty island without any buildings before the development.
As for the map after the construction, we can see there are more buildings and facilities have built on the island. In the centre of the island, there is a reception block which is surrounded by a vehicle track. This track is connecting down to the pier where the tourists can go sailing and enjoy the south sea view. There is a restaurant located in the north of the island.
Besides, there are two areas of the hotel blocks on the island. One is in the west near the beach, while another one located in the east. Furthermore, a footpath is connecting to the western hotel block and leads to the beach where tourists can enjoy swimming there.
Overall, comparing the two maps of the island, there are significant changes such as accommodations and activities after the development.
- The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world. 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the year. 73
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 73
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, furthermore, if, so, while, as for, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95384615385 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82786919455 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528205128205 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.0498568388 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.8181818182 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7272727273 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.63636363636 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367420787128 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133044894938 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0948208333451 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211776415456 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113399641648 0.0819641961636 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.