Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
It has been widely discussed whether students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is. Some people suppose that students ought to be forced to take history classes because history is the root of a nation, while the objectors state that it is a waste of time. As for me, I strongly agree that students should be required to take history courses.
First of all, taking a history course helps the student establish a clear perception of the outside world serves as the primary catalyst to my solid standing. Learning history course enables students to acquire the historical events, which decreases the possibility for students to make the same mistakes as the ancients. With the knowledge obtained from the history course can students build a correct outlook of the world, in which indicated that students can distinguish what is right as well as what is wrong. Likewise, acquiring the history of the world allows students to understand the development of science, which averts them from being superstitious. Based on a statistic which displays that more than eighty-one percent of the universities in the world take history as a requirement reinforces the reliability of my positions.
Furthermore, part of my position stems from averting various misunderstanding. A host of misunderstandings arise from people\'s ignorance of history since history courses have already indicated the reasons why different places have different conventions. With the knowledge acquired from history courses can people understand and respect the diverse conventions and avert being embarrassed by cultural shock. Learning history courses render students cognizant of cultural differences because they have already learned about the various taboos of a host of cultures from history courses. In addition, students who take history courses are more likely to take effective measures in order to deal with sudden conflicts while meeting cultural shock than other students who did not learn history knowledge. Recently, a longitudinal study which found that nearly seventy-nine percent of students who acquire history knowledge perform calmer when they meet cultural shock, which lends scientific evidence to my position.
In conclusion, it is a must for students to take history courses as a requirement. Because students are allowed to build their own perception of the outside world, which prevents them from being superstitious. Additionally, students are able to understand various conventions from different places, which avoid them from meeting cultural shock. All in all, taking history courses as a requirement of students has a multiple of benefits in students. I suggest that all of the universities should require students to take history courses for their own benefits.
- Ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline 85
- Do you agree or disagree: the universities should spend more money in improving facilities (libraries, computer labs) than hiring famous teachers. 90
- A high school requires their students (aged 16-17) to choose an activity to attend in the summer holiday between 11th and 12th. Which of the following do you think is more beneficial?-taking part in the university-level course (for example, the course rel 90
- Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than in the past 93
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 465, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...of benefits in students. I suggest that all of the universities should require students to...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, likewise, look, so, well, while, as for, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 13.8261648746 14% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.0286738351 172% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2383.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46559633028 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90524183132 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.45871559633 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 725.4 618.680645161 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4225602789 48.9658058833 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.421052632 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9473684211 20.6045352989 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15789473684 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.32028318263 0.236089414692 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137030630789 0.076458572812 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104385506193 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246169013489 0.150856017488 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0878991837766 0.0645574589148 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 11.7677419355 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.