Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Over the last half-century, the pace of change in the life of human beings has increased beyond our wildest expectations. This rapid change has created a wide sector of people who are in need for help to adapt to this modern society. Consequently, numerous organizations all over the world have started free community service programs. Although there are some commentators who believe that youth participation in these services should be always a personal option, I am strongly inclined towards the opinion that it should be an obligatory part of high school curriculum.
Firstly, youngsters who participate in the charity work teaching English to newcomers helping young children to learn sports, gain great experience, knowledge and moral values that will significantly influence their future studies in college or their careers. For example, a recent study conducted in London has shown that high school pupils who worked in unpaid community service achieved higher scores in their college exams. Furthermore, a lot of individuals in the society will have better access to the services offered by the community through those ambitious and active students. Lastly, the government could save money that can be allocated to other nationwide services such as the construction of roads, hospitals, and other projects. Undoubtedly great benefits will come from involving free community services in high school programs.
On the other hand, a strong argument can be made on the opposite side. To begin with, opponents think that these free activities might delay secondary school students from joining the college. In addition, many high school students need to work to save money for their university study, for instance, a recent statistics have revealed that more than 25% of high school student worked casual jobs to save money for their high school student worked casual jobs to save money for the future of studies. Moreover, high school curriculum is already overwhelmed by various subjects, thus it free services becomes a compulsory pack, this will burden the students.
To sum up, it can be clearly seen that the pros of adding society service in high school program outweigh the cons. I do recommend that the ministry of education encourage high school implements these steps make our community better.
- Some people say the economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it must be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 82
- You are a university student living in on-campus accommodation. You are having someproblems with the internet connection in your room.Write to the supervisor of your residence. In your letter Introduce yourself Inform him / her of the situation R 78
- You have just read an article in an inernational travel magazie which contained some information about your town that is incorrect.Write a letter to the editor of magazie. IN your letter- Correct the information in the article- Explain why it is important 89
- The pie graphs show the nutritional consistency of two dinners Write a report to a university lecturer describing the data Write at least 150 words 27
- You are going to another country to study. You would like to do a part-time job while you are studying, so you want to ask a friend who lives there for some help.Write a letter to your friend. In your letter,•give details of your study plans•explain w 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 586, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'frees'?
Suggestion: frees
...verwhelmed by various subjects, thus it free services becomes a compulsory pack, thi...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, if, lastly, moreover, second, so, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1952.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31880108992 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71184661542 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569482288828 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.4551810335 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.133333333 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6666666667 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29639197776 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881603650584 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574395913003 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174924341906 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192708791056 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.