tpo 6 online encyclopedias
The material discusses the drawbacks of online encyclopedias. While the reading looks at the topic from one perspective, the listening challenges certain points outlined in the reading passage.
Firstly, the reading details specific points regarding this topic, namely communal online encyclopedias lack accuracy. Next, hackers have chances to make changes and corrupt the content of encyclopedias. Finally, online encyclopedias have a large variety of topics, which could confuse children.
Conversely, the lecture challenges the points one specific contradiction is traditional encyclopedias do not close accuracy; furthermore, if people search for a reference that does not have any errors, they could not find it. Moreover, the errors in the online encyclopedias could be fixed; however, errors in printed encyclopedias remain for decades. In addition to that, hacking on the online encyclopedias could be solved by two strategies, first, people could put crucial factors and format that nobody could dispute. Second, special editors could monitor those changes and limit them. One final point, traditional encyclopedias have limited space, so experts should decide which academic topics could be published; as a result, it could not reflect the great diversity. one the other hand, online encyclopedias do not have this problem, it could have a great variety of topics and could reflect the great diversity of people's desire. Consequently, it is one of the strongest advantages of online encyclopedias.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-14 | Christine hanna | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Christine hanna | 76 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 776, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: One
... could not reflect the great diversity. one the other hand, online encyclopedias do...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, conversely, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, regarding, second, so, while, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 12.0772626932 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 22.412803532 54% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 30.3222958057 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1287.0 1373.03311258 94% => OK
No of words: 225.0 270.72406181 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72 5.08290768461 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04765119031 2.5805825403 118% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 145.348785872 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.577777777778 0.540411800872 107% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 419.366225166 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.55342163355 116% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6999329309 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.25 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.75 21.698381199 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 7.06452816374 173% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251441442987 0.272083759551 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116381894669 0.0996497079465 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873775184877 0.0662205650399 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173151308885 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0743803033491 0.0443174109184 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.3589403974 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.8541721854 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.2367328918 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.42419426049 115% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.