In recent years, the family structure has changed, as well as family roles. What are the changes occurring? Do you think these changes are positive or negative?
Family is the oldest social organization, whose structure has changed a lot in thousands of years, especially in recent times. Nowadays nuclear families are the main form of family in most of the cultures around the world. The roles of family have also changed as compared to before. Families are now more career and education oriented. Members of a family are now considered as individuals who have a saying in important family decisions. In my opinion, these changes are mostly positive, with a few negative consequences.
Changes in family structure has changed very rapidly in recent years. The noticeable change in family structure is the size of family. Nowadays families are smaller, usually consisting of parents and their unmarried children, which was not the case in the past. Also, families do not play the same role as a social entity as it used to. Families are much more concerned about career now than ever. For instance, in the past, there were not many families where both parents were working. In recent times, women employment has increased a lot, which means that both parents work. This is an important factor which contributes significantly in changes in family roles.
Education was never as important as it is now, which is another concern for families. Families want to ensure the best education for their children, that drives the family activities a lot. Another thing is, unlike the past, families teach their members to be individuals who stand up with their own opinion about the society, also how to develop themselves as strong personalities. Nowadays, every member of a family has a saying in different family matter, which encourages their self esteem.
Most of the changes in family structure is good, but there are also few negative impacts. Families are now much more strict and business-like in many aspects, which may be responsible for weaker bonding among family members.
To conclude, families are changing as always. Despite some negative effects, it can be said that these changes are for the greater good of our society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | munawwer | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | Shahrear59 | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-03 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | Ibknaanii | 56 | view |
- Some people believe that there should b fixed punishments for each type of crome Others however argue that the circumstances of an individual crime and the motivation for committing it should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishment Di 36
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989 96
- Nowadays families are not as close as in the past and a lot of people have become used to this Explain the reasons for this and discuss any possible effects it may have on society 84
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work, job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing.What factors contribute to job satisfaction?How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers? 56
- Some experts believe that it is better fof children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 39, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[3]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually not used at the end of a sentence.
... To conclude, families are changing as always. Despite some negative effects, it can ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, another thing, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1736.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65253116922 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507331378299 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.9817871724 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.9090909091 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 3.4128256513 293% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.40062734179 0.244688304435 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153782055509 0.084324248473 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103827234246 0.0667982634062 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.258900769228 0.151304729494 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871940333364 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.