The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
The line graph depicts the number of carbon dioxide each person discharges in the selected four countries across the world in 1967 and 2007.
Overall, the CO2 emission rates of Italy and Portugal showed a significant rise, while in the UK experienced a downward trend over the period. In Sweden however, they experienced an upward trend at the beginning but dropped sharply at the end.
In 1967, the CO2 emission of Italy and Portugal were nearly 4m and 1m, respectively. Portugal's rate increased gradually to about 3m in 1987 and a rapid surge to more than 6m in the following ten years. In the meantime, Italy increased sharply around 7m, exceeding Sweden's rate in 1987 and reaching almost 8m in 1997. Both countries remained constant through the end of the period.
The CO2 emitted in the United Kingdom experience a gradual decreased of about 11m initially and hit a low of about 8m in 2007. Furthermore, Sweden had almost 8m of CO2 emission in 1967 and hitting the highest point of about 10m in the next ten years. However, it dramatically declined to 5m in 2007.
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 78
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 86
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 901.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 186.0 196.424390244 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84408602151 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69299088775 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64225296888 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564516129032 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.0606054497 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319042000854 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107973911765 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780466862218 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170970687983 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309075449344 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.