For school children, their teachers have more influence on their intelligence and social development than their parents.To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a big debate that whether teachers or parents play more important roles on children's development in intelligence and social skills. In this essay I will analyse their main ideas and conclude my own opinion.
It is understandable that some people regard teachers as more significant roles for directing school children. To begin with, from attending the primary school, pupils spend most of the daytime with their peers and teachers on the way they growing up. Children are easily affected by their surroundings, which means that teachers' behaviour and style will be followed or learned by students. Furthermore, teachers do not only impart theoretical knowledge but also social skills such as how to get along well with others. Although some parents can also teach their children, the main responsibility of literal education is carried out by school and teachers.
However, parents' influence on children's education and formation of personalities should not be ignored. Parents are widely recognised as their children's first teacher. Their roles are irreplaceable especially before school age which is supposed as the crucial stage of intelligence development. For example, a family atmosphere that is conducive to learning could help children acquire knowledge with higher efficiency. Besides, children on their early growing phase tend to imitate their parents' habit, behaviour and even speaking style. These factors are essential for them to form social skills which cannot be easily replaced by school.
In conclusion, both parents and teachers have influence on children' learning and interactive development. While their roles are not quite the same, they shoulder equal responsibility on the way children growing up.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-30 | oceanyang | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-25 | oceanyang | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | pandaree.r | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | pandaree.r | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-11 | Tina Vũ | 56 | view |
- The natural resources such as oil, forest sand fresh water are being consumed at an alarming rate. What problems does it cause? How can we solve these problems? 84
- School leavers go travelling or working before they go directly to university. Is this a positive or negative development? 73
- Human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species. Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem. Others believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation. Discuss both views and give your opi 73
- Some people think that children with different abilities should be taught together while some think that intelligent children should be given special training or taught separately. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Some people think the main benefit of international cooperation is in the protection of the environment while others think that the main benefits are in the world business Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...by their surroundings, which means that teachers behaviour and style will be followed or...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56766917293 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86966242022 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.593984962406 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.3471598991 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.7333333333 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.377322522716 0.244688304435 154% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131090199238 0.084324248473 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481828352833 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239973097307 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386244547298 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.73 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.