Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Today is a world full of human inventions and technological applications. Science and technology have penetrated a thick portion of human life; usually, it makes a life of humans easy and less effort demanding. The acceleration of human advancement in a progressive is not halting; it matches the speed of bullet train in progress wise in a short period. In a few lapses of time, people have achieved a momentum achievement. The time between us and our grand ancestor has large gulf, in these moments various inventions and technology have arrived and persisted, making your life blessed with lots of invention and technological gift that we feel so easy on the spending of our life.
The time past a decade blatantly, a difficult one as they have nothing unique that they feel less tiredness and more enjoyable. People have to face a problem more often; the problem which is trite today was very breathtaking and painstaking in the time of our grandfather. Even a very simple problem now had a horrendous effect on the past. For instance, transportation and communication are no great deal for modern days people; it is a very less attractive problem for today's people. Everybody will laugh at people if they show this problem as their main problem. People have prioritized this issue in a trivial way. However, the same scenario has not applicable in the past time. This problem was very huge back then. People had to suffer a lot. To communicate people, they had to take long-distance with a doubt that the person would meet the person or not. On the other hand, there was also the trouble to travel; they have to travel a day or even a month to reach their destinations. Looking at the fact, people nowadays have enjoyed a lot their lives than our ancestors.
Similarly, health risk was great in the time of our grandfathers as no facility and advancement of the medical supremacy. Change in the scenario had resulted in a new health challenge that people had the only option to suffer. The life of the people was so miserable. People had died with a very fickle health issue. Many had died with a lack of infrastructure, knowledge, and cure. They had to live in a terrorized situation; what would come next and decimate a life of thousands. Tuberculosis, diarrheas, typhoid, etc curable diseases now were life sucking at that time. However, now people are gifted with the advancement of technology, the problem of health issue is cured at snipe of the finger. A thousand of the hospital and million of doctors are there to serve a patient. What else people will require to counter a health-related problem. This simple archetype is enough to explain the sophisticated living condition of the people.
In conclusion, people of the past indeed spent their life with a naturally beautiful environment; but they had to struggle a lot. People with great immunity only live longer at that time with a stroke of luck and struggle. But, today's people have extra features to live- science and technology. Hence, the life of people today has easy and far more comfortable when our grandparents were children.
- Altruism is a type of behavior in which an animal sacrifices its own interest for that of another animal or group of animals. Altruism is the opposite of selfishness; individuals performing altruistic acts gain nothing for themselves. Examples of altrui 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Universities should require students to study many subjects in different fields rather than just their major subjects. 73
- tpo 08 the Chevalier memior 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?If people have the opportunity to get a secure job, they should take it right away rather than wait for a job that would be more satisfying.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Archaeologists have recently found a fossil of a 150-million-year-old mammalknown as Repenornamus robustus (R. robustus). Interestingly, the mammal'sstomach contained the remains of a psittacosaur dinosaur. Some researchers havetherefore suggested th 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 602, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a trivial way" with adverb for "trivial"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lem. People have prioritized this issue in a trivial way. However, the same scenario has not app...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 673, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...same scenario has not applicable in the past time. This problem was very huge back then. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 733, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... finger. A thousand of the hospital and million of doctors are there to serve a patient...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 812, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'countering'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: countering
... patient. What else people will require to counter a health-related problem. This simple a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, similarly, so, then, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 52.1666666667 136% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2588.0 1977.66487455 131% => OK
No of words: 531.0 407.700716846 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87382297552 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.48103885553 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8421741754 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 258.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485875706215 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 815.4 618.680645161 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 32.0 20.6003584229 155% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.8878965199 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.875 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.59375 20.6045352989 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.25 5.45110844103 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 3.85842293907 389% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123039427499 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0348146889497 0.076458572812 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501509299012 0.0737576698707 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901440233335 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475372828387 0.0645574589148 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 11.7677419355 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 58.1214874552 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.1575268817 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.01818996416 99% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.