Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance
The statement claims that the teachers salaries should be based on the students academic performance. It is true that the progress or the performance of the student’s to a certain extent depends on their teachers because they are the primary sources of information for them and they help in moulding the students for their future.
But in the end the future of each of these students is in their own personal hands and how they manage to improve and be consistent with their own performances depends on the hard and smart work put up by them. It would be unjust for the teachers to have their salaries based on the hands of the students. There is a possibility that even though the teachers might do the most extra and unnecessary things like taking extra lectures for the benefit of the students for which they are not paid for but ultimately the student does not perform because he does not understand the importance of the work the teacher has put up on him by being ignorant or lazy. In such cases it is not the teachers who are responsible for the students future and should not suffer because of their incompetence.
Now, if a certain class performs consistently worse then it might be necessary to check why they are performing poorly. If the class performs poorly in their first test then it can be assumed that either the question paper was difficult to solve or the teacher did not do his job properly of teaching them or the students did not prepare judiciously for the test. In such cases the management should not take any decisions hastily as there is no unbiased way of knowing who is responsible for the poor performance. But if the trend continues for the next few tests then the management should analyse the performance of the students under different teachers. If the performance of these students other subjects are also poor then the students are to blame. But if the students are performing poorly only in this particular subject then the teacher is to blame. In such conditions the salaries of the teachers should be based on the performance of the students as they are responsible for their poor performance.
Thus it would make sense for the salaries to based on the performance of the students provided that the management know the whole picture of what is happening in each of the classes so that neither parties suffers from the incompetence of each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | Oladelejnrr | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sahil nain | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 47, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse than'?
Suggestion: worse than
...f a certain class performs consistently worse then it might be necessary to check why they...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 53, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...rtain class performs consistently worse then it might be necessary to check why they...
^^^^
Line 9, column 659, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the students under different teachers. If the performance of these students other...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...nsible for their poor performance. Thus it would make sense for the salaries to...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, thus, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1991.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76315789474 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67522312231 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 215.323595506 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425837320574 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 603.0 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.312164539 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.214285714 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.8571428571 23.4991977007 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.52957598674 0.243740707755 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.235321356551 0.0831039109588 283% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.148100483007 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.357834172323 0.150359130593 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130336799988 0.0667264976115 195% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 48.8420337079 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 12.1743820225 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.92 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.