Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance
The prompt talked about a polemic issue where it stated that the salaries of teachers should be determined by the performance of their students and I disagree based on the following thought process
Firstly, it's imperative to note that regardless of how well or how worse a group of student are taught, there will always be the high graders and low graders, the high graders might be so due to factors not even related to how they are being taught in school, factors like that may range from hiring private tutors, arduous and determined spirit and also proper hygiene, likewise, the low graders might also be as a result of factors which are not remotely related to the mode of teaching.
Another reason is that, all students evince disparities and inequalities in ability, hence this makes it unlikely that at the end of a test or an exam, their results will be show uniformities in grading because they are taught well or not, there are nonchalant students as well as studious ones, there are serious-minded students as well as the unserious opposite, traits like these in students makes it inscrutable to base a teacher's salary on his/her students' performance.
On the flip side, basing teachers' salaries on their students' performance might help to make the teacher's put increased effort in teaching their students, it can also give rise to increase in examination malpractice as the students' performance are now the basis of which the teachers are getting paid, it will make it harder to truly determine a student's true ability and level.
In conclusion, teachers' salaries should not be based on the academic performance of their students as the students' performance are not always a true determinant of how well or how worse the methods of teaching In their school are.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-15 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | Oladelejnrr | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-26 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-24 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sahil nain | 50 | view |
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 66
- Technological advancement has made our lives easier and more convenient but it has also brought about significant ethical challenges To what extent should ethical considerations shape the development and use of technology 50
- If a goal is worthy then any means taken to attain it are justifiable 50
- To understand the most important characteristics of a society one must study its major cities 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 427, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...students makes it inscrutable to base a teachers salary on his/her students performance....
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 223, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...rease in examination malpractice as the students performance are now the basis of which ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a student' or simply 'students'?
Suggestion: a student; students
... will make it harder to truly determine a students true ability and level. In conclusio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 107, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ic performance of their students as the students performance are not always a true deter...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, likewise, may, so, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 58.6224719101 67% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1481.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 301.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92026578073 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70237957676 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498338870432 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 462.6 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 20.2370786517 20% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 75.0 23.0359550562 326% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 166.364622141 60.3974514979 275% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 370.25 118.986275619 311% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 75.25 23.4991977007 320% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 24.0 5.21951772744 460% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.528688962496 0.243740707755 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.367658310974 0.0831039109588 442% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135381219115 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.348367155696 0.150359130593 232% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170077537126 0.0667264976115 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 39.4 14.1392134831 279% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 3.81 48.8420337079 8% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 31.4 12.1743820225 258% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 12.44 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.38706741573 129% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 54.0 11.8971910112 454% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 32.0 11.2143820225 285% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.