tpo30-indepandant
In the modern era career and its hours is one of the hated issues among governments and people. In fact, people requests modifying the work hour's condition to be proper with the employees’ condition. while, among employees, some group prefers to work five days with short time, other’s preference is few days’ works with long hours. I am in favor of the condition of a work that advocates three days with long hours of work due to some points like, having enough time for hobbies, completing works and high performance, spending time with family.
Initially, in the advancement societies, hobbies are known as a significant part of every person’s personality and his life. In the other words, hobbies raise the rate of creativity and happiness and undeniably these abilities advocate a person to be prosperous in the life and work. However, groups refer to benefit of long day’s work but short long time’ s work can be more beneficiary due to its positive effects on both life and work. For example, my friend who works at the office for three days can spend time on his hobbies and everything that supports him to improve his abilities and skills. Therefore, three days’ work with long hours seems logical to accept than five days for a long time.
As a second point, tasks that are completed in one day refine the rate of the company’s profits. Because long time or complete day work presents plenty of time to employees for their tasks. while in the short time terminate the work without achieving goal create disrupt between works. Plus, employee’">employee’s attention will be diminishing. A full day of work supports workers to have high attention and best performance. For example, five months ago the office where I am working there decided to test the employee’">employee’s performance between two group with two kinds of working hours, three days’ work with long hours and five days’ work with the short time that the outcomes proved the more performance among the first group. As a result, working hours let to employees complete the tasks in one day of work and its effect on worker’s performance id undeniable.
Finally, everybody is familiar with the family’s importance in life and its role in prosperity. works with fewer working days create a good chance to spend more time with family. The result of researches depicts that persons who have more time with their family, are optimistic about life and it can improve the rate of being successful in the working field. In the other words, being sanguine cause to positive energy which leads the employee to doing tasks accurately. For instance, some companies in Japan are using this method which reduce the working days in a week but the hours are long, reports illustrate that the performance of happiness employees is appropriate and consistent of company’s expectations.
Consequently, I agree with the statement which mentions three days’ work with long hours base on three reasons that supports my opinion like more time to entertainment, completed job and suitable operation and more time for family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | zizi.dream | 3 | view |
- tpo33-integrated 75
- Tpo30-Integrated 75
- T p o 42 85
- tpo30-indepandant 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When teachers assign projects on which students must work together, the students learn much more effectively than they are asked to work alone on projects. Use specific reasons and examples to support 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In the modern era career and its hours i...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 212, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...per with the employees' condition. while, among employees, some group prefers to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rformance, spending time with family. Initially, in the advancement societies,...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... accept than five days for a long time. As a second point, tasks that are ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...y of time to employees for their tasks. while in the short time terminate the work wi...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 202, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...y of time to employees for their tasks. while in the short time terminate the work wi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ker's performance id undeniable. Finally, everybody is familiar with the ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Works
...nce in life and its role in prosperity. works with fewer working days create a good c...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stent of company's expectations. Consequently, I agree with the statement...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 76.0 52.1666666667 146% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2666.0 1977.66487455 135% => OK
No of words: 515.0 407.700716846 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17669902913 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.763781212 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.37865416804 2.67179642975 126% => OK
Unique words: 236.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458252427184 0.524837075471 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 804.6 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.4899409159 48.9658058833 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.181818182 100.406767564 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4090909091 20.6045352989 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.68181818182 5.45110844103 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 58.1214874552 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.1575268817 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 10.9000537634 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 86.8835125448 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.