TPO 4
The lecture and the passage discuss about dinosaurs which can be define or not in the endotherm’s animal group that manage their body temperature without environmental effects like mammal and human. The passage believes that dinosaurs take place in the endotherm’ group. Whereas, the professor in the lecture declares that base on some evidence this animal should be in the reptiles group instead of endothermy.
First, the reading passage mentions that fossils which detected on the polar location prove that dinosaurs can be endotherm due to bear the cold weather. However, the professor argues against that by saying that weather condition was different than now and it was warmer. She states that while dinosaurs live on the warm season there, at the cold seasons migrated to warmer places due to lack of potential to control their body temperature ability. Therefore, polar fossils are not powerful enough to confirm the idea.
Second, the reading says that physical features of the endothermy make possible some activity like running due to their leg state. In other words, the leg should be state underneath doing some activities while, the reptiles like crocodile leg place don’t let them to running due to legs’ position on the side of the body. While, the lecturer explains that this body structure supports more weight and allow them to grow in an immense dimension. Consequently, leg position don’t advocate them being endotherm.
Third, the passage discusses about Haversian canals that appears on the endotherms’ structure which make possible swift growth and dinosaurs’ fossil have this bone. In contrast, the lecture mentions that other evidence like growth ring proves the opposite idea. She mentions that growth ring shows that this animal experienced low rate of growth in the cold weather unlike endotherm which even in the cold weather growth rapidly.
- TPO32-integrated 88
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Education children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games, and social networking Web site. Use specific reasons and examples 90
- tpo33-integrated 75
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 81
- TPO35-INTEGRATED 3
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 283, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ake place in the endotherm' group. Whereas, the professor in the lecture declares ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[2]
Message: Did you mean 'different 'from''? 'Different than' is often considered colloquial style.
Suggestion: from
...ng that weather condition was different than now and it was warmer. She states that ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'stated'?
Suggestion: stated
...tate. In other words, the leg should be state underneath doing some activities while,...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, however, if, second, so, therefore, third, whereas, while, in contrast, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 12.0772626932 149% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 22.412803532 120% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 30.3222958057 132% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1614.0 1373.03311258 118% => OK
No of words: 300.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70077149472 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 419.366225166 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5524799466 49.2860985944 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.285714286 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.272083759551 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0996497079465 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0662205650399 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.162205337803 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0443174109184 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.2367328918 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.42419426049 104% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 63.6247240618 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.