two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information and make comparisons.

Essay topics:

two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.

Summarise the information and make comparisons.

The two maps illustrate some major alterations that have taken place on the road access to the City Hospital between the years 2007 and 2010.

I general, the road network connecting to the city hospital has seen many advanced changes over a period of 3 years. Although the changes are very few, it has helped in building a more effective and safe road network. Furthermore, architectural changes add on to beautify the network.

One interesting change is that all the bus stops along the Hospital Road have been knocked down to make way for a larger bus station on the west side of the Hospital Road. This bus station has been given access to both of the main intersections along Hospital Road. Another striking change is that the common car park has been modified into a car park only for the staff. The public car park has been shifted to the free space on the east side of the City Hospital.

A Final interesting development has been at both of the intersections on Hospital Road, one with Ring Road and the other with the City Road. These have been transformed into roundabouts, which has been quite useful for buses and cars for easy access onto the main roads.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-03 gudupatnaik1996 61 view
2019-11-03 gudupatnaik1996 61 view
Essays by user gudupatnaik1996 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68269230769 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46911394404 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528846153846 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.855502075 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.4 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.247014671503 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103258513058 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101686790309 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176279463343 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103817248314 0.0819641961636 127% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.