The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone call in the UK, divided into three categories, from 1995-2002.
The chart illustrates the entire average of minutes of telephone call in the United Kingdom. it compares three categories in the period from the year 1995 to the year 2002.
Overall, the total number of phone calls is fluctuated over the period in all categories. Evidently, as we can see from the graph, while both national and international and mobile calls were relatively similar in the trajectories, gradually rising, there was some variance in the average amount of fixed calls, that has fallen steadily.
With regards to total number of minutes made by mobiles (all calls), there was a consistent great increase from 2 in 1995 to 45 billions in 2002, rising in more than twenty-twofold. Furthermore, the trend of national and international calls is not so significant as the previous group. The average amount of minutes of this trend increased at approximately twofold, from 35 billions in 1995 to 61 billions of minutes in the year 2002.
In contrast, whilst other courses were rose, local fixed calls in the UK have seen a gently decrease, reaching the highest point of the trend in 1999 at 90 billions. After the tendency of increasing, it fell to 77 billions in the year 2002, reaching almost the same numbers, as were at the beginning of the mentioned period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | rchauhan.micro | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Saeedeamani | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | koinoyokan | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-08 | kulwa | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-08 | Vo My Anh | 84 | view |
- The maps below show the changes experienced by the town of Horton at the beginning of the 21st Century 74
- The process of electricity generation using an artificial lagoon and tidal power 89
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 79
- town of Hillingford between 2000 and 2015 92
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...f telephone call in the United Kingdom. it compares three categories in the period...
^^
Line 9, column 393, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '61 billion'.
Suggestion: 61 billion
...ly twofold, from 35 billions in 1995 to 61 billions of minutes in the year 2002. In contr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 84, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('gently') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
..., local fixed calls in the UK have seen a gently decrease, reaching the highest point of the tren...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1070.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 216.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9537037037 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80902181667 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.3862161467 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.888888889 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337768782284 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134707738165 0.103423049105 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750661923601 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192697828475 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0877645008089 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.