Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
Plants and animals are the main ecological factors for balancing the climatic condition of nature whereas birds and animals have equal rights on earth as humans. But due to unnecessary human activities and greed to earn more money and resources have made these species endangered. I strongly believe that these species should be preserved for future generations for the reasons I will cover in the below passage.
To begin with, animals and plants play a prominent role in maintaining the balance of climate. They regulate the oxygen cycle of earth and holds the soil which is fit for agriculture. They provide the fertility of the area and with the excess deforestation, the ecosystem can be degraded. For example, timber cutting in the Amazon rainforest located in Brazil leads to an action result in a forest fire and the area gets degraded temporarily and the damaged area will take about ten years to refurbish. The smoke and fire killed many of the species those were only found in that specific area and become extinct.
Second, the poaching should be stopped, they hunt the precious animal for their valuable skin, bones, teeth and, many more organs as an artifact. Hunting of lions for their skin and teeth. For example hunting of lions in African Savanah leads to a reduction in the population of lions and increment of the other animal leading to the disturbance in the food chain and the omnivorous leads to the degradation of fertile grasslands.
In Conclusion Poaching and deforestation can affect the ecosystem and leads to the animals in the endangered state which must be stopped. Particular steps should be taken to conserve these species for future generations.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-20 | Dimitrina | 60 | view |
2019-12-21 | Manu2525 | 70 | view |
2019-12-06 | bishoy | 76 | view |
2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
2019-11-07 | MOHD ARAFAT | 76 | view |
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Human activity is making the earth a worse place to live Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 52
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 66
- which life is comfortable our generation or our elders. do you agree or disagree 60
- Some people think that human needs for farmland, housing, and industry are more important than saving land for endangered animals. Do you agree or disagree with this point of view? Why or why not? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, whereas, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 11.0286738351 36% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 43.0788530466 30% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1977.66487455 71% => OK
No of words: 280.0 407.700716846 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03571428571 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.48103885553 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6389836479 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 212.727598566 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.564285714286 0.524837075471 108% => OK
syllable_count: 445.5 618.680645161 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.6003584229 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7143954642 48.9658058833 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.461538462 100.406767564 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122131098186 0.236089414692 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463582636863 0.076458572812 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0228401688247 0.0737576698707 31% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741334701615 0.150856017488 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0197794844414 0.0645574589148 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 11.7677419355 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 10.9000537634 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 86.8835125448 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.