The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The two different charts demonstrate some information about destination of UK graduates and postgraduate in 2008. Noting that students with full-time work were excluded in both groups results.
To bring the results in the light, four destinations were investigated for UK students in both bar charts which displays exactly the number of students in each group. As, you can see, the population of postgraduate students were exceptionally less than graduate students, respectively 1/10 times. Apart from this, further study was the most popular goal for both group which was experienced high number of students in 2008.
Also, it should be noted that, having part time work was the next priority of both groups based on the revealed results. I think that students who were worked part time after graduation was due to their aim for further study. The next point I would like to mention that is about the number of unemployed students who were enjoyed a dramatically decrease in post graduate students in comparison with graduates which acclaims that further study, the more job opportunities you may had in 2008. Along with this, voluntary work had a lowest share on the both groups.
- TPO5 3
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 72
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. What do you think are the causes of these problems and what measures could be taken to solve them? 61
- The first chart below shows the results of a survey which sampled a cross-section of100,000 people asking if they traveled abroad and why they traveled for the period1994-98. The second chart shows their destinations over the same period.Write a report fo 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1997 and 2004 in five European countries. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 39, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
... Also, it should be noted that, having part time work was the next priority of both grou...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 160, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
.... I think that students who were worked part time after graduation was due to their aim f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...of unemployed students who were enjoyed a dramatically decrease in post graduate students in comparison...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 529, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
...08. Along with this, voluntary work had a lowest share on the both groups.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, apart from, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12886597938 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7251032444 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.592783505155 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6777314909 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235245572489 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109241670895 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549541913034 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185637238833 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524687924135 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.