The table below shows employment patterns for males and females in New Zealand in 1993 and 2003
The table describes the employment structure for men and women in New Zealand.
Overall, it is clear that in both years more women were gainfully employed in services and transport sectors, while the number men in social services remained the least.
In the first year (1993), more women got jobs in services and transport (53), manufacturing (25) and social services (13) respectively, while men were gainfully employed in agriculture (38) business (7) and building (12). It is worthy to note that no woman was given appointment in building sector.
However, in 2003, the number of women employed in business increased significantly to 22 as well as men 25. There was also a dramatic reduction in the total number of men that worked in agriculture (7). Furthermore, 6 women got employment in building. In addition, the number of women that worked in social services remained high (18) while men that secured employment in social services was low (9).
- Nowadaays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this becomr a positive or negative development? 56
- The table below shows employment patterns for males and females in New Zealand in 1993 and 2003 78
- The table below shows employment patterns for males and females in New Zealand in 1993 and 2003 71
- The table below shows employment patterns for males and females in New Zealand in 1993 and 2003 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 157.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03184713376 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85746710574 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522292993631 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.240515274 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.875 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127608673549 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759600855803 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0973259981345 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119040586797 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117357426483 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.5 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.