Nowadaays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this becomr a positive or negative development?
The advancement of technology has modified the manner in which most individuals relate with one another. This is a negative development because individuals no longer establish long lasting relationships.
To start with, one of the effect of phones and computers is that the person is not able to create lasting relationships, the demand of jobs and studies has decreased the need of face-face interaction. People tend to make friends on social network because it is easier to connect with people. For instance a person might have a thousand friends on facebook with no close friends. Most people spend time online, chatting rather than meeting people.
I believe this has become a negative development because it diminish interpersonal relationship skills. The individuals are not able to express themselves properly the reason is, phones have images that show emotions whiles they chat so they are not able explain what they feel and speak less in social gatherings. Futhermore, loneliness as a result of poor relationship skills this might lead to depression affecting the individuals mental health, because they do not have anyone to confide in when situation arises.
In conclusion, computers and phones has made personal relationship difficult, people look for a convenient means of making acquaintances. I believe this is a negative development because of its impact on social skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Ngochai | 89 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | pratik.dadhaniya | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | Harrynguyen1980 | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Garrett | 84 | view |
- The table below shows employment patterns for males and females in New Zealand in 1993 and 2003 71
- The table below shows employment patterns for males and females in New Zealand in 1993 and 2003 61
- Nowadaays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this becomr a positive or negative development? 56
- The table below shows employment patterns for males and females in New Zealand in 1993 and 2003 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'diminishes'?
Suggestion: diminishes
...ecome a negative development because it diminish interpersonal relationship skills. The ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1187.0 1615.20841683 73% => OK
No of words: 219.0 315.596192385 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4200913242 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01820612133 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 176.041082164 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579908675799 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 506.74238477 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0896149949 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.909090909 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226218114957 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.093439788305 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0573229210315 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139793146847 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300023903146 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.