Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach
Colleges and universities hire faculties which meet the university’s requirements and are skilled in their respective fields. The colleges and universities do not find allotting time for the faculties to work outside the academic world as the institutions require them to teach the students their respective courses. I strongly agree with the policy that universities and colleges should require their faculties to spend time working outside the academia in their respective fields. I think this way mainly because of two reasons.
Firstly, working outside the academic world would provide the faculty with more exposure in their fields and are likely ot gain much more practical experience from it rather than working in the same monotonous enivronment in their institutions. The faculty may be able to gain more field work or may be able to attend events pertaining to their fields which would eventually result in the professor gaining more knowledge from them. If the faculties of the institutions gain more knowledge and gain more experience through this policy then it would be more beneficial to the institutions as they would endorse such skilled personnel. This would be further supported by the various research opportunities which the faculties would carry on in the institutions and would be enabled to get government grants and opportunities.
Secondly, if the faculties are allowed for working outside the institutions then they may be able to attend more conferences, events or may meet new people which would result in increasing the networking between the faculties and their counterparts. It would thus be beneficial as the faculty would be under the institution's banner and endorse the institution's name everywhere, thus increasing the universitiy's reputation among the academic world. It may also happen that if the faculty may not be able to perform a research alone but, because of the networking during his time outside the institution, may have enabled him to meet another faculty of another institute. They may then be able to carry out the research jointly which would benefit both the institutions.
Thus, the policy would be beneficial for not only the faculty but also be much more beneficial to the institution as it may increase the institution's reputation and may also enable the institutions to get grants for the research by the faculty.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 70 | view |
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 83 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | tedyang777 | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Danbrilliant | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Danbrilliant | 62 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 138, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
... the institution as it may increase the institutions reputation and may also enable the inst...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2004.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 379.0 442.535393258 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28759894459 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98881590541 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 215.323595506 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.395778364116 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 627.3 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 23.0359550562 126% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.2827514132 60.3974514979 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.153846154 118.986275619 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1538461538 23.4991977007 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 5.21951772744 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225228064931 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113866452996 0.0831039109588 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114172146131 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160007430222 0.150359130593 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142854836187 0.0667264976115 214% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 48.8420337079 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.74 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 11.2143820225 121% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.