The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that childrenSpend watching television.
The line graph reveals the amount of time spending and watching TV by kids in 1950 to 2010.
Overall it is clear that the largest average number of viewing television is between 1990 and 2000.
Accordingly to the graph,kids expenditure watching TV rapidly increase during these years. In 1950 this amount reach the lowest point about half an hour as the years went by the trend rose dramatically to four hours in 1980.
There is a slight drop in 1985 approximately three hours and a half but in the following years the hours grew even further to almost 4 hours and a half in 1995. Between 1995 and 2010 children’s television viewing hours fell noticeably and reach to three hours and half.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | Vahideh_abd | 69 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s. 78
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that childrenSpend watching television 69
- many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. what are the advantages and disadvantages of both situation? 56
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Accordingly,
...levision is between 1990 and 2000. Accordingly to the graph,kids expenditure watching ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 25, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , kids
... and 2000. Accordingly to the graph,kids expenditure watching TV rapidly increas...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 588.0 965.302439024 61% => OK
No of words: 122.0 196.424390244 62% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.81967213115 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.32345618554 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61283911581 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622950819672 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 154.8 283.868780488 55% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.1903861732 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.0 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.194741549694 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948597435702 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.012055948824 0.0843802449381 14% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110903794819 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00845188108406 0.0819641961636 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 18.0 40.7170731707 44% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.