The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s.
The pie chart reveals the key component of decreasing farms yield and the table compares the impact of these alterations in North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s.
Overall, it can be clearly seen that the largest amount of global land degradation belongs to overfeeding of animals and obviously Europe is the most affective religion in the world wide.
According to the pie chart, over-feeding animals lead to 35% of land degradation which has the highest contribution of this global challenge. Cutting trees accountant for 30% of destruction and stood at second place. The third most remarkable reason which has almost identical share of cycle is over-cultivation (28%). Other reasons were responsible for 7% of affection.
The table illustrates the significant amount of disturbing occurred in Europe which has 23% of total land degraded. Oceania and North America contributed respectively 13% and 5% of total global agricultural challenge. Over 10% of Europe land degradation is because of deforestation and over-cultivation was the second reason (7.7%). In Oceania by far the most important reason for disturbing lands was animals over-feeding with almost 11%.
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that childrenSpend watching television 69
- many university students live with their families, while others live away from home because their universities are in different places. what are the advantages and disadvantages of both situation? 56
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reason why agricultural land becomes less productive the table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during 1990s. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 160, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 1990s'.
Suggestion: in the 1990s
...ns in North America, Europe and Oceania in 1990s. Overall, it can be clearly seen...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rica, Europe and Oceania in 1990s. Overall, it can be clearly seen that the...
^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...e is the most affective religion in the world wide. According to the pie chart, ove...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 179, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...e is the most affective religion in the world wide. According to the pie chart, ove...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ective religion in the world wide. According to the pie chart, over-feeding...
^^
Line 9, column 153, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'trees'' or 'tree's'?
Suggestion: trees'; tree's
...ution of this global challenge. Cutting trees accountant for 30% of destruction and ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 177, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llenge. Cutting trees accountant for 30% of destruction and stood at second place...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, so, third
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48901098901 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11968422412 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.4712879951 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146412898889 0.215688989381 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.057190668747 0.103423049105 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0342996753271 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0937454730799 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024996778054 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.