Which areas of concern should governments allocate funds to? Climate change, education, or public health? Explain your idea with examples.
Recently, the phenomenon of allocating funds by governments and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of climate change are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that sophisticated education can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, allocating funds can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of public health, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of efficient education. Hence, beneficial ramifications of climate change are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, allocated funds can provide the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality demerits of essential areas are significant. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described costly education. Thus, the predicted outcomes of inefficient public health are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of allocating funds by governments far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of climate change prove the significance of sufficient public health, but also pinpoint possible implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Marketing in companies should be based on reputation or short term strategies? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 11
- Some universities deduct marks from students' works if given in late, what are your views and what action will you recommend 85
- Some people argue that young people should concentrate on study or work. Some people think it is better to put energy in activities designed to broaden their experience, such as international travel and volunteering. Support with examples or cases. 88
- Poor lifestyles have a negative impact on people's health. List some unhealthy lifestyles and discuss what government services could help? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79908675799 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26610761872 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.643835616438 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6879394732 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273167473849 0.242375264174 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863848271489 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0581792985956 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15337935252 0.151781067708 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0440760144899 0.0609392437508 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.36 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.71 8.32886699507 129% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.