Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of differential education, i.e., splitting students into different classes according to their academic performance.
Recently the phenomenon of differential education and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matters of splitting students are highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that different classes can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, different education can provide the society with noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of academic performance, are visible. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the importance of hard-working students. Thus, beneficial ramifications of efficient classes are remarkable.
From a scientific point of view, differential schooling can supply the community with negative impacts, which are related to the reality that demerits of time-consuming classes are crucial. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university described inefficient students. Hence, predicted outcomes of dismal academic performance are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that benefits of differential education far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of splitting students prove the significance of academic performance, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1282.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 213.0 242.827586207 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01877934272 5.00649968141 120% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3921219342 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652582159624 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1844368846 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.545454545 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3636363636 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249596716159 0.242375264174 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077461505525 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579116301544 0.071462118173 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135607344334 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0457909449475 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.81 53.1260098522 50% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.64 11.5310837438 153% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.