Work
The reading and the lecture are both about the consequences of offering four days a week work. The author of the reading feels that this policy would be a benefit for the company, as well as employee's life quality. The lecture challenges the claims made by the author. His opinion is that the policy would not benefit companies and the quality lives of employees.
To begin with, the author states that four days work policy would increase the profit of the company. The specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He claims that the new policy would force the company to spend more money. Additionally, he says the company will need to give training to the new employees, as well as takes care of the health benefits and the company needs to buy new computers. So, this all would make the company spend more.
Secondly, the author mentions that this policy would reduce the unemployment rate as companies would need more employees. The lecturer, however, refutes this idea by saying that as per the previous point, hiring new employees is costly. So companies might ask the worker to do four days of work in five days. So that employees would not get tired.
Finally, the author posits that this new policy would improve the quality of lives. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that quality of life would put a person's life at risk. He explains this by saying that the company might prefer five days working for management. So, the four days policy would put the employee's job at risk.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-20 | Hello GRE | 80 | view |
| 2024-08-09 | yamatos | view | |
| 2024-03-25 | TANVIR SIDDIKE MOIN | 70 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | xujia | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | YasamanEsml | 80 | view |
- Weight 68
- Altruism 76
- Altruism 61
- Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news. During the same time period, most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with 63
- Weight 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...any, as well as employees life quality. The lecture challenges the claims made by t...
^^^
Line 9, column 310, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r to do four days of work in five days. So that employees would not get tired. Fin...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ion is that quality of life would put a persons life at risk. He explains this by sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cy would put the employees job at risk.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in contrast, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.4613686534 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 7.30242825607 41% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 30.3222958057 79% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 261.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78927203065 5.08290768461 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35261522002 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 145.348785872 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463601532567 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 419.366225166 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 13.0662251656 130% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 21.2450331126 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.3605338684 49.2860985944 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5294117647 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3529411765 21.698381199 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17647058824 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116373221493 0.272083759551 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511640984104 0.0996497079465 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0923330107858 0.0662205650399 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897706938384 0.162205337803 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00931451012418 0.0443174109184 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.3589403974 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 53.8541721854 136% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 11.0289183223 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.91 12.2367328918 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.42419426049 89% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 63.6247240618 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.498013245 76% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.2008830022 62% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.