The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in the
years from 2012 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features
and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the data in terms of the quantity of travelers visiting Phu Quoc Island on 2 elements between 2012 and 2015.
During the three-year period, total tourist arrivals’ figures increase steadily, particularly, the total of number tourists arrivals were 300,000 visitors in 2012 and surged to a peak of 1,500,000 visitors in 2015. Additionally, the total number of tourists arrivals continued to rise to over 600,000 turns in 2013 and to 1,000,000 turns in a year later.
Looking at the graph, it’s immediately obvious that international tourists traveling to Phu Quoc are still very few. There were 100,000 foreigners who took the trips to Phu Quoc in the year of 2012 and a slight rise the years later. In 2013, the statistics of 150,000 foreign tourists arrived this island and it was approximately 200,000 arrivals in the year of 2014.
Throughout the total tourist arrivals' report show that almost tourism arrivals enjoying their trips are domestic holiday-makers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Hoangnhi | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | KhangVTran | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | ngothithunguyet | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 72
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make omparisons where relevant 92
- The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in theyears from 2012 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main featuresand make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The chart below shows the places visited by different people living in Canad Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 83
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 words. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 214, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...urged to a peak of 1,500,000 visitors in 2015. Additionally, the total number of ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, still
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 859.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36875 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90578625332 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58125 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 231.3 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8881840949 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.714285714 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.57142857143 5.23603664747 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156108509395 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839084151177 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0331626090987 0.0843802449381 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105206914353 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0169783176504 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.