The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in the years from 2012 to 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the amount of tourists to Phu Quoc from 2012 to 2015
Overall, the tourist travel to Phu Quoc increased while the foreign tourist increased slowly.
In 2012, there was around four hundred thousand of Total Tourist Arrivals, while the Foreign Tourist Arrivals was about nearly two hundred thousand people. In the year 2014, the Total Tourist Arrival has one million people while Foreign Tourist Arrival has two hundred people. From 2012 to 2014, Total Tourist Arrival increased about six hundred thousand people.
By 2015, Total Tourists Arrivals continued increases. There was about six hundred tourists. Howerver, Foreign Tourist Arrivals also increased insignificant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-14 | Hoangnhi | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | KhangVTran | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | ngothithunguyet | 56 | view |
- The chart shows the export value of Viet Nam fruits in the year 2013.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
- The pie chart shows the distribution of different religions in Vietnam in the year 2009.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The chart shows the numbers of tourists to Phu Quoc in the years from 2012 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 19, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... increased slowly. In 2012, there was around four hundred thousand of Total To...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 33.7804878049 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 600.0 965.302439024 62% => OK
No of words: 106.0 196.424390244 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66037735849 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.2086804361 3.73543355544 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36376768114 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 51.0 106.607317073 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.481132075472 0.547539520022 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 165.6 283.868780488 58% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.0564023573 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7142857143 112.824112599 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173253265359 0.215688989381 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095301940917 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738518359052 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148812014936 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0769233437249 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.