TPO 32
In this set of material both the lecturer and the reading passage discuss the "quackers" phenomenon which is an underwater noises which was detected by Russian submarines in the past. While the reading passage provides some theories to enlighten this effect, the lecturer utterly refutes all these possibilities.
Firstly, the professor articulates it is unlikely that the source of these sounds are related to the Orca whales. Because these whales are mostly living near the surface of the occean. However, the submarines are going to the deepest part of the occean. So, it is unlikely that the submarines sensors detect the sound of the whales. On the other hand, the text contends that one theory propses that the sounds which the submarine detected may be related to these whales' ritual. Because some researches have revealed that the sound which are made by these whales are similar to those that the submarines were detecting.
Moreover, the professor avers that some evidences are against the theory that these sound may be generated by giant squids. Because these sounds firstly recorded in 1960 and were continued for two decades but suddenly after 1980 the sounds were disappeared. So, it is impossible that these sounds has been produced by the whales. Conversely, the reading passage alleges the giant squids are difficult to detect by sonar and it is possible that they may emit the sound.
Finally, the lecturer declares that it is impossible that another submarine has emitted these sounds and disappeared quickly. Because nowadays, which the technology has improved so much, the submarine with these speed ability have not been invented. On the contrary, the essay asserts that it is a probabillity that the sounds have been created by foreign submarines unintentionally and they have had a kind of technology that the Russian submarines could not detect them.
- TPO 25 - Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Young people nowadays do not give enough time to helping their communities.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 51Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- TPO 55: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?When classmates or colleagues communicate about a project in person instead of by e-mail, they will produce better work for the project. 73
- TPO 29 66
- TPO-20 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only doing what they know how to do well.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... sounds are related to the Orca whales. Because these whales are mostly living near the...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 479, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... may be related to these whales ritual. Because some researches have revealed that the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, so, while, kind of, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 10.4613686534 220% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 12.0772626932 166% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 22.412803532 165% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 30.3222958057 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 5.01324503311 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1373.03311258 116% => OK
No of words: 305.0 270.72406181 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23606557377 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72116136264 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 145.348785872 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472131147541 0.540411800872 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 419.366225166 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9599809342 49.2860985944 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 110.228320801 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 21.698381199 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460975652345 0.272083759551 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165469167701 0.0996497079465 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086848624101 0.0662205650399 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277082137336 0.162205337803 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11325327033 0.0443174109184 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.3589403974 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.2367328918 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.42419426049 101% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 63.6247240618 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.7273730684 84% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 63.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.