nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed. What is the reason for doing this?
Is this a negative or positive development?
Many parents put a huge pressure on their children for the betterment in their life. Emphasizing too much on the success can affect the children both positively and negatively. But I think it causes more negative outcomes for the children.
Firstly, many factors play a role in pressurizing the children. Parents always want their children to succeed in real world and thus pressurize them in many types of activities. For instance, forcing a child to study much so that he can do better than other in the examination and in future, get a good job. The reason behind this is that today’s world is extremely competitive. If someone doesn’t cope up with the ever-increasing competition, it may be really difficult for him/her to move forward. Moreover, parents also pressurize the children so that they can get a good job in future life. Additionally, parents also force their children because they believe forcing can help their children to achieve good social recognition.
However, this can turn out to be a very negative development for the children. Putting too much pressure at an early age can create distance between the children and their parents. Children may start to despise their parents. Moreover, while putting pressure can be a good thing sometimes, it can also be a very fatal reason of being scared of that specific task. For example, forcing them to study much may create a fear or they may feel demotivated towards study. They can be mentally depressed as well as unstable.
To conclude, I want to say that it is never a good thing to put so much pressure on children. It is undeniable that kids will need proper guidance and motivation from parents. But it should always be in controlled manner so that they can maintain a balance in their regular life and enjoy childhood.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-20 | Evelyn_Han | 78 | view |
| 2019-06-13 | Malokhat Khusainova | 56 | view |
| 2019-06-13 | Malokhat Khusainova | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-16 | Esther Katlyn | 61 | view |
- The pie charts below show the spending of a school in the UK in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- The government should allocate more funding to teach science rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree? 67
- Many things that used to be done in the home by hands are now being done by machines. Does this development bring more advantages or disadvantages? 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisions where relevant. 78
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 20002 to 2007 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... negative outcomes for the children. Firstly, many factors play a role in pre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 282, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...etter than other in the examination and in future, get a good job. The reason behind this...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 301, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...their regular life and enjoy childhood.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, moreover, really, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, i think, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 7.85571142285 216% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95098039216 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79341236369 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513071895425 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.4606744757 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.7368421053 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1052631579 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94736842105 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366145083617 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11921967117 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0797074231686 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238045382537 0.151304729494 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0904918128491 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.0946893788 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.