The figure shows the results of a survey of 1000 adolescents in five different countries. The participants were asked at what age they believed certain rights and responsibilities should be granted to young people.
The bar chart illustrates the views of 1000 youngsters in five countries on the most suitable age for three kinds of rights and responsibilities that should be given to adolescents.
It shows for marriage, Egyptians and people who live in Mexico believe that people can marriage if they over 16. While for USA and UK, people who live in there suppose marriage should be planed only for child who age over 18. The Japanese has the highest requirement for this figure which the age number is higher than 22. A similar pattern was seen in the results concerning voting age. The highest one appear in Japanese where people believe voting right should be given to people who age over 20. While the lowest figure for this appear in UK and Mexico which the number are just 16.
For criminal responsibility, the highest age still be seem in Japan which the age is 18. The figure for the rest of four countries, interestingly, are all lower than 15 and in USA the number of this figure is the lowest one which only 12.
Overall, the figure for all three right in Japan are higher than other four countries and USA has the largest gap for the figure in criminal responsibility.
- The chart below shows the amount spent on six consumer goods in four European countries.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 73
- Eating sweet foods produces acid in the mouth, which can cause tooth decay. (High acid levels are measured by low pH values)Describe the information below and discuss the implications for dental health. 56
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The plans below show the information on the first floor of a particular library in1995 and the same area at the present time. Select the main features shown below and give comparison where relevant. 78
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to handle this problem? 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 3.15609756098 349% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 977.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67464114833 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52745733235 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.473684210526 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 302.4 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2877529156 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.7 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.6 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187716777655 0.215688989381 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0867969523157 0.103423049105 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412811882299 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125475425569 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434756725964 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.97 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.