Space
The reading and the lecture are both about the private space tourism. The author of the reading feels that private space tourism will benefits citizens as well as scientists. The claim made by the author is challenged by the lecturer. He says that it will not benefit anyone.
To begin with, the author states that the cost of the space flight will be cheaper as the competition will get increased. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. He says that the space flight will be expensive. The private organization will have to develop the space traffic control system as well as good safety equipment, both will need too much cost.
Secondly, the Author claims that privatization will accelerate the rate of discoveries as the aerospace industries sponsor scientific research. The lecturer, however, contends this point by saying that it will prevent discoveries because scientists have high salaries in the government organization and if the privatization happens, their value will get degraded, So indirectly discoveries will also degrade.
Finally, the author points out that the privatization will benefit the taxpayer of the country. On the other hand, the lecturer notes that space tourism is not possible without public tax. They will need to build the space stations and the space airports which will cost too much. Investors' sponsorship will not be sufficient to build stations and airports, they will need to take funds from people, which will result to raise a tax.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-24 | saamaan | 83 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | saamaan | 76 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | xujia | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | madinaaaaaaaaaa | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-18 | YasamanEsml | 32 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'benefit'
Suggestion: benefit
...g feels that private space tourism will benefits citizens as well as scientists. The cla...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 176, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...enefits citizens as well as scientists. The claim made by the author is challenged ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 5.04856512141 396% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 1373.03311258 92% => OK
No of words: 242.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21900826446 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68754243982 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 145.348785872 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.512396694215 0.540411800872 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.0 419.366225166 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.4512160712 49.2860985944 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2142857143 110.228320801 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06452816374 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232107057606 0.272083759551 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122363469539 0.0996497079465 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130806936256 0.0662205650399 198% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17346947424 0.162205337803 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100874150784 0.0443174109184 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.2367328918 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.42419426049 97% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.7273730684 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 19.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.