Life was better when technology was simpler.
To what extent do you agree and disagree?
It is argued that when technology was simpler, life was better. I totally disagree with this statement; technology makes our life easier and simpler than before. This essay shows how life becomes better by using technology.
Firstly, technology plays an essential role in our life. Not only does it make communication between family members more easy but also it helps them to feel safe, even though they are far away from each other. Mobile applications and social media are assisting people to contact anyone, even if they are not in the same country. For instance, in 1998, when I was working at Gulf countries, it was hard to contact my family; however, now it is really easy to call my family anytime, or see them by using mobile applications.
Secondly, the internet revolution changed the way that people got and shared information .getting information for any life aspects is faster than the old days. It is the fact that, World Wide Web improves our lives by providing us with the required answers by a simple click on the keyboard. For instance, if I want to get information about something, I will go to internet and google it .But in the past, I had to visit a library to search in books in order to get the needed information. Moreover, the invention of Internet helps us on education. To illustrate, I live in Saudi Arabia; I took an online IELTS course with a teacher who lives in Egypt without the need of travelling there.
In conclusion, in the modern era, the power of technology has shifted the balance from the hands of a few to the masses. Which helps people on communication, education, and gaining information by easiest ways. There is no doubt that technology makes our lives better.
- Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor. What are some of the reasons for world poverty? How can poor be helped?Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 61
- A person worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possessions Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent do you agree or disagree 92
- Life was better when technology was simpler. To what extent do you agree and disagree? 67
- People prefer to communicate through social media and internet rather than face-to-face meetings. Is this positive or negative? 61
- Air transport is increasingly used to export fruit and vegetables to countries where they cannot be grown or are out of season. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 89, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...y that people got and shared information .getting information for any life aspects...
^^
Line 9, column 388, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ing, I will go to internet and google it .But in the past, I had to visit a librar...
^^
Line 9, column 390, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: But
...g, I will go to internet and google it .But in the past, I had to visit a library t...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79530201342 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69316574877 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60067114094 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5218780025 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225188397753 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850754776921 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147448058751 0.0667982634062 221% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156059053229 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15602940799 0.056905535591 274% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.