In today's world, it is important to work quickly and risk making mistakes rather than working slowly and make sure that everything is correct.
In the last three decades, the world has changed drastically. The job market has become more intricate and competitive. Some companies put their employees under stress to work fast and risk making mistakes, in order to achieve financial success. From a personal perspective, working slowly and make sure that everything is correct is better than working quickly and under pressure, given that slow working has a positive impact on safety, productivity and rational thinking. Below I will strive to explain my supporting points in more details.
The first and foremost point, when employees work slowly and relaxed, they could enhance safety. Furthermore, making mistakes in some occupations is very harmful and could not be fixed. For instance, physicians and pharmacists have to take their time to finish their work given that patients' safety is the number one priority. Provided that they work in a stress-free environment, they could provide a strong health care system. Consequently, slow working is significant for safety.
Next, coupled with safety, thinking rationally is another virtue of more relaxed approach at work. Employees who work slowly could focus on their work, so they make mistakes less often. A vivid example that could be given to shed light on what was elaborated above, two years ago, my brother started to work in the management department of a prestigious company. Since, he has worked in a stress-free atmosphere, he could analyze relevant information, such as data and judgments and make optimal decisions. To illustrate this point, working in a calm environment help him to gain a profound understanding of many aspects, so they could improve his guidance based on facts.
Ultimately, productivity is another subtle point that should be born in mind. Even though employees who work under pressure could finish their work faster, they are less effective. To be more elucidate, they usually fell tense and overwhelmed, thus they end up hating their jobs. Nevertheless, employees who work slowly could be more productive. For example, the software and hardware engineers in Silicon Valley work in a relaxed environment, they could come up with new designs and projects, which play a vital role in companies’ financial success. As a result, working slowly is integral to promote productivity.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt, a more relaxed approach at work could not only enhance employees' mental well-being, but also foster safety. It is suggested that companies design new programs that help their employees to do their roles without stress and improve their work-capacity.
- A/D....Education children is a more difficult task today than it was in the past because they spend so much time on cell phone, online games and social networking Web sites. 73
- tpo 20 the policy of let it burn and its effect on Yellowstone park 81
- tpo 45 fossilized structures could resemble a bee nests 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? With the help of technology, students can nowadays learn more information and learn it more quickly. 73
- learning is better form people who are high-level or form people who are at our own level 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 307, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...stress and improve their work-capacity.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2227.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 415.0 407.700716846 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36626506024 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51348521516 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8956858205 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 212.727598566 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559036144578 0.524837075471 107% => OK
syllable_count: 675.0 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.6003584229 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4327920909 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8260869565 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0434782609 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47826086957 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 11.8709677419 126% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299316250378 0.236089414692 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952173972993 0.076458572812 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.091474745343 0.0737576698707 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187882717006 0.150856017488 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.089637229957 0.0645574589148 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 58.1214874552 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 10.9000537634 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 86.8835125448 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.