Some people believe the government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion.
Others think that building more and wider roads is a better way to reduce traffic congestion.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is important to find out how increasing congestion on roads can be reduced. While some people believe that to mitigate this issue the authorities should invest in the construction of more and multiple lane roads, I, along with many others, opine that building train and subway lines is a more effective way to reduce traffic.
On the one hand, some people support the construction of additional pathways and the widening of the existing ones because of multiple reasons. First, with the availability of alternative paths, the travellers can take less congested ways and thus reduce the traffic on the main roads. Secondly, by increasing the number of lanes, the slow and fast-moving vehicles can have a different lane for their smooth movement. To exemplify, after the development of NH-8 six-lane Noida-Gurgaon Highway the daily ongoing traffic has been reduced to 30%. However, this solution is least effective as gradually it can increase the number of cars, bikes and buses on the roads.
On the flip side, some people assert that building train and subway lines are more beneficial for mitigating the problem of traffic and I fully agree with this view. This is because metro lanes, underground pathways and local train lines are the fastest and convenient services as they can not only cover the long distances in a short span of time but also accommodate a larger number of passengers in comparison to cars and buses. Also, if commuters avail of these services on a daily basis, then there will be a significant reduction of vehicles on the roads. For instance, with the introduction of subway metro lines in New Delhi, 60% of road congestion was reduced in the last 2 years.
In conclusion, although wider and multiple roads can reduce the traffic to some extent, in my opinion, to remedy this issue train and subway lines are quintessential as these are fast and can carry a large number of passengers leading to less road congestion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | daly.shaker.99@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Dongvo | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Prabhjot Kaur Bhullar | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-01 | D87eepak | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | nobita | 84 | view |
- Some people spend a lot of money on tickets to go to sporting or cultural events.Do you think this is a positive or negative development? 73
- Some people say that all secondary and higher school students should be taught how to manage money as it is animportant life skill,Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 67
- Parents and teachers make many rules for children to encourage good behaviour and protect them from danger.However, children would benefit from fewer rules and greater freedom.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- In many countries, people are living in a “throwaway society” where things are used for a short time and thrown away.What are the causes of this and what problems does it lead to? 73
- You are disturbed by the rubbish and litter problem in your area and street Write a letter to the local council In your letter describe the situation Inform them about the possible consequences give some suggestions to solve the problem 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 199, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...sential as these are fast and can carry a large number of passengers leading to less road congest...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 328.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99085365854 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25567506705 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71302408809 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533536585366 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0550590551 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.416666667 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.295683181348 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102368914948 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10543072083 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202857035971 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0689188399535 0.056905535591 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.