All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with these statements and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statements might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position
A fresh set of eyes is often said to bring out new insights that ultimately aids with the betterment of the task. Companies primariry hire outside consultants for this specific purpose. To assert "Inputs from such consultants are insignificant if the company listens to their own employees" is lacking for the following two reasons.
First of all it is necessary to understand that their are different factors that affect the efficient working of any company. These factors can vary depending on the type of company it is. To elaborate, for a product based company it is important to assess the current market, understand customer needs, work on customer feedback, keep a tab on competitor products, research and develop new line of products and many other factors.It is true that a company is run by their respective employees, but it is also true that employees, most of the time, can't keep up with all the necessary changes required to keep the company at its peak all the time. For such reasons, when an expert from the outside world in invited, they provide information, ideas and suggestions what would have never been thought of by any employee.
Secondly, these consultants know that their livelihood depends on proving the companies with such information. They are likely to keep abreast with the latest update or modifications in the market requirement. A good counsultant is capable of providing incisive and distinct understanding that further leads to the success of the respective company. It is also possible an employee might provide biased opinions and tries to hide the drawbacks of his fellow employees.
This does not mean that a company should completely rely on such outside consultants and ignore the suggestions of their own employee. A company should maintain a balance between both the aspects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | Arpit Sahni | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-24 | shamitha | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | caseya5 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-14 | Siddiqur Rahman | 50 | view |
- Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented. The given issue 50
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village 63
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... all it is necessary to understand that their are different factors that affect the e...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 432, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...line of products and many other factors.It is true that a company is run by their ...
^^
Line 5, column 550, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... true that employees, most of the time, cant keep up with all the necessary changes ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, secondly, so, first of all, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 2235.4752809 69% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17391304348 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90779932606 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56856187291 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 704.065955056 66% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 97.4691576161 60.3974514979 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330717695982 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112188392556 0.0831039109588 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0926062400914 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204918365636 0.150359130593 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655862809022 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.