The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over a six-month period in 2011.
The line graph illustrates how many enquiries (in person, by letter/email and by telephone) the Tourist information office in a certain city received between January and June in 2011.. Overall, in-person enquiry showed a steady but significant rose in the period, while by email or letter query experienced a downward trend. Telephone enquiry had some fluctuations. Though the least amount enquiries were received in person in January, however, in the end, it became the highest number received, On the one hand, person enquiry in Jan was about 420 and it the least one in the starting month and the next following months it rose significantly 600 and 800 respectively. Between Mar to Apr person query increase dramatically to around 1250. At the end of the period, it holds the maximum number of queries. with around 1900. However, through a letter or email queries showed a gradual decrease in Jan it is accounted for just below 800 and in Feb it slight decreases to almost 700. From Feb to Mar email or letter enquiries were stagnant. Between Mar to May, it plummeted under 400 and in Jun it is stagnant as the same previous month and it holds the least number of queries received at the end of the period. On the other hand, starting the month of the Jan it holds the highest number of telephone queries received with more than 800 and subsequent month also it received maximum number when compared to others while it decreased to the previous month to 800. In March, it rose to1000 and still holds the highest queries but the next month it was stagnant and the person query moved the highest enquiry. Between Apr to Jun, telephone enquiries rose gradually and at the end of the period, it rose to 1600.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-18 | lunanguyen0701 | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-15 | KIM JINUK | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish. 67
- The chart below gives information about science qualifications held by people in two countries. 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999. 67
- Friendships can be very meaningful and special, but also very complicated. What are the qualities of a great friend? What are some things that can weaken a close relationship over time?Write at least 250 words. 73
- Most people have forgotten the meaning behind traditional or religious festivals; during festival periods, people nowadays only want to enjoy themselves. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...eceived between January and June in 2011.. Overall, in-person enquiry showed a ste...
^^
Line 1, column 805, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: With
...it holds the maximum number of queries. with around 1900. However, through a letter ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 948, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'slights'?
Suggestion: slights
...ounted for just below 800 and in Feb it slight decreases to almost 700. From Feb to Ma...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, still, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 298.0 196.424390244 152% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72483221477 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55768105017 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.442953020134 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 283.868780488 150% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 3.36585365854 386% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.8666079666 43.030603864 188% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.307692308 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 5.23603664747 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291268254948 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0956593672183 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780464301625 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291268254948 0.15604864568 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.38 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.