The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
The line graph compares how many tourists to England who visited the art Gallery, Pavilion, Pier and Festival in Brighton from 1980 to 2010.
Overall, despite fluctuations the number of tourists who went to the Pavilion and Pier increased while art Museum's figure decreased significantly over the period given. It is also noticeable that holiday spenders who went for the Festival remained relatively the same.
Between 1980 and 1995, there was a sharp increase of tourists in the Pavilion from around 23% to about 48%, after which the figure dropped steadily to just over 30% in 2010. Similarly, the percentage of tourists visiting the Pier started from 10% in 1980 and went up dramatically to just above 20% in 2010.
The number of holiday spenders who decided to see the Art Gallery in 1980 was almost the same figure that of the Pavilion at 23% and rocketed to peak at approximately 28% in 1985, before plummeting to hit a low of just under 10% in 2010. Festival's figure hovered between 25% and 30% throughout the entire period.
- The line graph below shows the number of serious crimes that occurred in London between 2003 and 2012. 78
- The table shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 56
- The graphs below show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1980 and 2000. 67
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than on roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement. 78
- The bar graph below show the numbers of university students who chose Italian as their primary subject from 1960 to 2000. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9209039548 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57345718058 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 97.0 106.607317073 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54802259887 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 253.8 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.4525127815 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162681971978 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0839422947909 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0950438806528 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122421870852 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106067721145 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.