The bar chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
The bar chart illustrates how often the US citizens went to fast food restaurants in the years 2003, 2006 and 2013.
Overall, it is clear that the percentages of the population who ate at fast food restaurants every day and those who never ate were lowest. Most of the American people spent time eating at fast food restaurants between once or several times every month and once a week.
From 3003 to 2006, a decrease of approximately 2% was seen in both the proportions of people never eating fast food and those who ate on a daily basis. By 2013, there has been no change in these segments.
By contrast, the major differences can be found in the groups of who ate at fast food restaurants on a weekly basis (once or several times a week) and in the groups in which people visited these places from once to a few times per month. While in 2006, more than one-third of the US population had meals at fast food restaurants once a week, in 2013 most of them did so only once or twice every month. Interestingly, the figure for those eating several times every year remained stable from 2006 to 2013.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-07-12 | farshid.manami@yahoo.com | 56 | view |
- The bar chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. SOme people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others believe that the problem can be solved by providing computers and 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47524752475 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45863733785 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529702970297 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.3273504255 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.25 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309333182284 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.149749431022 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0991672807695 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228693052817 0.15604864568 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.095004860293 0.0819641961636 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.0 11.4140731707 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.75 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 40.7170731707 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.