In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. SOme people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others believe that the problem can be solved by providing computers and Internet access. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
It is often argued that the Internet and technological devices can help children in remote areas to learn better. While reasons can be given to justify this, I believe that sending teachers and building schools are a more effective approach.
On the one hand, there are those who believe that computers and the Internet play a more significant role in education in rural areas. Firstly, advances in technology can create equal opportunities for every student living in poor condition. Most of children from rural communities fail to go to school due to geographical adversities, but this can be tackled by the assistance of modern technology. Instead of travelling a long way to schools, students can stay at home, access to their school websites and find their online classes just by using a computer via the Internet. Secondly, the Internet can provide students with a colossal amount of knowledge about almost everything in this world. Therefore, children perhaps learn both fundamental subjects such as Maths or Science and broaden their horizon by many ways.
On the other hand, I side with those who believe that teachers and school systems are a more important factor. The first explanation why we need to build schools is that they can create a standard learning environment. Every child has the right to go to school with adequate facility, where they can learn, interact with their peers and grow as a person. Additionally, it is impossible to deny the role of teachers in education. Apart from teaching subjects, rural children need someone who can share with them life experience and inspire them the love for learning.
In conclusion, despite the undeniable benefits of the Internet and advanced technological equipment, I firmly hold the view that it is more necessary to set up schools and provide teachers in order to improve the education system in remote locations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-25 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-29 | nguyen thuy an2309 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | Dongvo | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-09 | ali_mohammadi | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-24 | Legendmaker | 100 | view |
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. SOme people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others believe that the problem can be solved by providing computers and 84
- The graph below shows the number of overseas visitors to three different areas in a European country between 1987 and 2007 73
- The bar chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- the bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
... help children in remote areas to learn better. While reasons can be given to justify ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the children') or simply say ''Most children''.
Suggestion: Most of the children; Most children
...every student living in poor condition. Most of children from rural communities fail to go to sc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, apart from, as to, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1589.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12580645161 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78218840493 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577419354839 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0082261949 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268956493991 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905354446157 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0538262131333 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1603003646 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0601684487022 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.