The table below gives information about consumers spending on different items in 5 different countries in 2002.
The table compares the percentage of spending in 3 categories in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
Overall, Turkey's spending was the highest overall in 2002. All countries spent the most on food/drinks/tobacco while the least spending can be seen in leisure and education.
In terms of food/drinks/tobacco, Turkey spent the most at 32.14%. The spending of Ireland was also high at 28.91% as compared to Sweden, which spent the lowest, at 15.77%. Spain and Italy's expenditure was 18.80% and 16.36% respectively.
With regard to clothing/footwear, the highest spender was Italy at 9% while Sweden spent the lowest. The expenditure of Turkey, Spain and Ireland was relatively the same at approximately 6.5%.
Leisure and education comprised the smallest spending in all countries at just under 5%. While Turkey's spending was about 1% bigger than that of Sweden and Italy at 4.35%, Ireland and Spain's figures were approximately 50% of Turkey's expenditure.
- Some people think that not all criminals should be kept in prison. Some criminals should do unpaid work to help other people in the community. Do you agree or disagree with the statement? 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 78
- The chart below shows the proportion of income adults and children spent on 4 common items in the UK in 1998 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton. 73
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and in 2010. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...othing/footwear, the highest spender was Italy at 9% while Sweden spent the lowes...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 836.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46405228758 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27454241827 2.65546596893 123% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 232.2 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.0542331922 43.030603864 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.6 112.824112599 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.1 5.23603664747 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.100911374262 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0517735375638 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0500380707068 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771336923586 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562646446632 0.0819641961636 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.